You can’t manage what you don’t measure, as Peter Drucker famously said. But when you measure too many things, knowing where to focus your reporting becomes a real challenge -- as anyone in charge of ESG performance reporting can attest.
And unfortunately, focusing on the right ESG metrics is proving to be increasingly difficult because of the proliferation of ESG frameworks, guidelines, and standards in recent years.
ESG standards exist for a good reason. They give companies a way to benchmark their organization against their peers. They provide hard data needed to share their ESG performance with investors, employees, customers, and many other interested parties. Most importantly, ESG standards help keep businesses accountable for doing their part to ensure a sustainable future for the planet.
But ESG standards have become an ever-changing maze that is increasingly hard to navigate, both for the companies who are reporting and the audiences which they are trying to reach. According to EY’s The Future of Sustainability Reporting Standards, the number of ESG regulations and standards globally has nearly doubled in the last five years, and there exist 600+ ESG reporting provisions globally, with many having differing interpretations of sustainability.

Source: The Future of Sustainability Reporting Standards, EY
As a result, many companies are now asking themselves whether they are measuring, managing, and reporting on the right things.
Too many standards creates a disconnect with investors when the focus of the standards being reported against is not aligned with the information that investors are asking for. (According to PWC, only about a third of investors think the quality of reporting they are seeing is good enough.) Even worse, there is a very real risk that businesses are becoming so distracted by managing multiple standards and frameworks that they lose focus on the most material aspects of their impact on the planet.
At Investis Digital, we know of companies who have put a pause on further investment in improving their reporting until the path towards more standardization and alignment is clearer. Fortunately, there are signs of hope. In September 2020, five international framework- and standard-setting institutions – the CDP, CDSB, GRI, IIRC, and SASB -- co-published a shared vision of the elements necessary for more comprehensive corporate reporting and a joint statement of intent to drive towards this goal.
More recently, the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation announced in 2021 a new International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to develop a comprehensive global baseline of high-quality sustainability disclosure standards to meet investors’ information needs. However, the United States and European Union are taking different approaches to sustainability reporting, as noted in EY’s report.
How should companies navigate this maze? In fact, the starting point is to look outside the maze. The first question is a company should ask is not “Which reporting standards should we follow?” but “How do we create value for our different stakeholders?” And the challenge becomes communicating that value.
In communicating sustainability matters we find it helpful to frame a narrative around three foundational pillars: transparency, leadership, and connectivity.
On March 24th, we’re going to discuss this issue with a panel of ESG industry leaders at an event we are hosting in conjunction with PR Week, “Build a sustainable future through the power of comms.”

The panel of ESG and communications experts from Vodafone, Bupa, and Anthesis Group will address key communications issues including:
To learn more about the panel, please register here. Meanwhile, if you need a little TLC – or would just like to talk about sustainability and ESG communications – let us know!