It’s a widely publicized fact that Facebook is a dominating power in the world of social media. The “Golden Globe winning” social networking site certainly has found its way onto the worldwide stage. As brands and marketers we’re at the mercy of Facebook when attempting to use the portal as a means to attract and engage fans. One way of gaining traction on the site, however, is through search.
Sure you might be thinking, “Why would you even care about Facebook search?” Surprisingly, Facebook’s search share has increased, so take notice. Users ARE indeed using search throughout the site to the tune of 2.7% of all US searches – comScore reports. This number seems pretty darn insignificant when making this disclosure to SEM and SEOers but in the broad scheme of things Google, with 64% of search share, can’t facilitate what Facebook can: brand engagement.
Facebook search consists of mostly information not spidered by search engines (except of course for fan pages and a few other items inside Facebook). If you’re spending a large chunk of change on Facebook for brand engagement then it would behoove you to start thinking about how best to optimize for organic visibility too.
Over the summer the folks at the aimClear blog put together a study about Facebook internal search and in November updated their information with a second post after all the Facebook changes to search happened. What they discovered was quite interesting….
One of the most important areas to rank is: the AutoComplete box generated after you start a search query. The AutoComplete box ranks according to:
This is pretty similar to Google’s old “Suggest” functionality. In the case of Facebook the personalization factors supersede the search volume of the terms it seems, which differs from Google’s old “Suggest” feature.
Many of the factors taken into consideration for the “AutoComplete” box are similar in Facebook’s organic search results. Personalized factors are extremely important in “All Results”, but also important are total “Likes” of a business page, status updates with search term, and web results. In “People” searches aimClear discovered that there seems to be more of an emphasis on a keyword match in both network and location. In “Pages” searches it seems Facebook has a bit of progress to make. Clunking up organic search results are the usual Fan pages, but in addition are Place pages, Community pages, and some web pages (not on the Facebook domain). aimClear’s study found that, consistent with other areas of Facebook search, the results are very much affected by personalization factors. Some of the observations from the study include:
Their study also examines “Groups” search, “Events” search, “Apps” search, and “Web” search as well. Consistent throughout is the emphasis on personalization. Many of us already know that the more fans you have “Like” your page is important, but in search it’s even more so important. That one fan can effectively enhance your overall exposure in Facebook search in an exponential fashion.
The study done by aimClear is certainly a great post for social media marketers as well as SEM/SEOers looking to rank in Facebook search.