Privacy regulations, data processing agreements, cookie rules are a positive sign of the internet becoming a better, safer and more respectful place for everyone. However, for companies that are required to implement these regulations and follow the prescribed rules, there is a lot of confusion on how to practically adhere to them.
As any Data Protection Officer will tell you, the privacy regulation landscape has become a lot more complex over the past two years. While eventually there is likely to be more standardization in how privacy regulations are applied across the globe, this is a distant ideal that unfortunately won’t be realized for many years to come.
Till then, companies should be vigilant and keep a close eye on how the globe is being fractured into policy zones, with different flavors of privacy regulations and nuances to cookie management expectations. This can be especially problematic when addressing data protection measures. What may be an appropriate way to protect data in one country can be very different to how data should be protected within another. In fact, the very definition of what constitutes what data should be protected can differ between policy zones. Confused already? It’s about to get worse.
Companies are stuck in the mire of the evolving regulations…and evolving they are! PECR (EU), CCPA (California), LGPD (Brazil), PDPB (India), GDPR (EU), CPLT (Chile), FDPA (Switzerland), Privacy Act (New Zealand), etc. In most of these regulations, there have been major and minor amendments over the past 12 months alone.
The problem would be easier to solve if the policy zone regulations applied strictly to those interacting with your content within the same policy zone as your company, but they don’t. This problem is well illustrated by the humble company website. Unless your company blocks access to the company website for any site visitor outside of a named policy zones, you need to consider the policy zone that the site visitor is visiting from. You cannot assume the site visitor is from a policy zone you prefer to work with. In other words, an EU-based company site doesn’t only need to consider the EU-policy zone (where GDPR and PECR applies), but other policy zones which site visitors could be visiting from. In the U.S., the same applies. Just because you think you’re serving mainly a U.S. audience doesn’t mean you can ignore the regulations within the other policy zones.
Then we add browser cookies into the mix and the problem gets even more complex. With cookies, getting consent from the site visitor before loading the cookie (depending on the policy zone of the site visitor) is just part of the challenge. Schrems II (a ruling by the Court of Justice of the EU in July 2020) showed that irrespective of whether consent was provided for cookies loading, if these cookies were being used to transmit data to the U.S., they probably shouldn’t be loaded at all. What the industry previously took for granted with compliance in data transfers between countries (including data transferred through cookies), was clearly not as robust as we thought. The use of Google Analytics, the favored and cost-effective way to understand the traffic on a website, has now been put into question for EU-based companies simply because the site visitor’s data is being sent outside of the EU and into the U.S. for processing. Real fines, not just the threat of fines, are being applied to companies who do not toe the line and companies are often not aware of where the line is that they need to toe! A few years ago, who would have thought that EU-based companies would be in a situation where they could get fined for loading Google Analytics cookies? The very foundations of how website performance is analyzed has been shaken. Fast forward to the coming months and years, further surprises will await.
So, now you expect this blog to reveal the answers to the problems and challenges I’ve mentioned. Well, I can certainly give you answers to the predominant questions I hear from companies every day, where companies are desperate for clarity on what a compliant cookie manager looks like, where a non-compliant cookie manager could result in your company being fined by the regulators. But for the wider concerns, companies faced with the evolving privacy standards, there is no easy answer. Your choices are either to partner with a company that has their finger on the pulse of privacy regulations or to put time into researching the latest amendments across the increasing number of policy zones that appear each year.
As for the important aspects to consider when choosing a cooking manager, it’s quite simple.
Whether you are a customer of Investis Digital or not, please get in touch at [email protected] if you have questions. The privacy regulation and cookie management landscape can be frightening to face alone.